|
|
Last Modified on Nov 06, 2025
Construction sites are seeing increased worksite enforcement. When agents appear, site leaders must quickly determine whether they face (1) an administrative Form I‑9 inspection or (2) a judicially authorized search and possible arrests. The steps below are designed for jobsite use and are grounded in controlling law.
1) First question: audit or search?
- Administrative I‑9 inspection (a “NOI”): This is a records audit. You are entitled to at least three business days to produce the Forms I‑9 named in the notice. Treat on‑scene requests to hand over records as scheduling—not immediate production.
- Warrant‑based search/raid: Agents may enter only the places and seize only the items described in the warrant. Keep a copy, note who is present, and escort agents only to the listed areas.
2) If agents serve a Notice of Inspection (I‑9 audit)
- Acknowledge receipt, collect the agent’s card, and inform the agent that counsel will coordinate production within the statutory timeline.
- Confirm the scope: which entity, location, and time period are listed; what records are requested; and where production must occur. If the NOI names a subcontractor, notify the subcontractor and do not accept service or commit to produce that company’s records.
- Plan for follow‑on letters. After review, ICE may issue a Notice of Inspection Results (compliance), Notice of Suspect Documents, Notice of Discrepancies, Notice of Technical or Procedural Failures (typically allowing at least 10 business days to correct technical errors), Warning Notice, or a Notice of Intent to Fine. Prepare your responses in advance.
Minnesota Construction Law Services keeps the simple simple
3) If agents arrive with a search warrant
- Ask to see the warrant; read it. Confirm it is signed by a judge and identify the specific areas/records. Escort agents to those areas only; do not consent to expand the search.
- Nonpublic areas require a warrant or valid consent from someone with authority. Do not allow entry to offices, trailers, or fenced work zones based solely on an administrative subpoena or an agent’s request.
- Employees may choose whether to speak with agents. Supervisors should not tell anyone what to say or not say. Routing questions to counsel is appropriate; blanket “do not talk to ICE” directives can create obstruction risk.
- Never destroy, hide, or alter records. Maintain normal safety controls and identify hazards for agents.
4) After ICE leaves
- Debrief with counsel and the site team. Create an inventory of what was taken and recreate any files removed so operations can continue.
- Reassure the workforce and avoid retaliation. Workers who raise concerns or cooperate with authorities are protected from retaliation under federal law.
- Calendar deadlines for any follow‑on notices (e.g., the technical/procedural 10‑day correction period) and organize a clean production set.
5) Readiness checklist (train on this now)
- Adopt a written ICE‑response protocol naming a site lead and a back‑up.
- Train gate/front‑office staff to route agents to the site lead, request identification and any NOI/warrant, and call counsel.
- Centralize I‑9 files and keep an “NOI production kit” (index, retention matrix, and cover letters). Document retention should follow the I‑9 rules.
- Issue wallet cards or toolbox‑talk posters reminding employees of their rights (voluntary interview; right to consult counsel), without directing them not to speak to agents.
- Reinforce litigation‑hold culture: once an inquiry begins, no shredding, back‑dating, or edits.
Disclaimer
This alert provides general information and is not legal advice. Circumstances vary by site, subcontracting structure, and jurisdiction. Consult counsel for specific situations.